Defend The Children.Org

Act Now

   Proposed by   

Protect.org


PROTECT's nonpartisan agenda will take the best ideas of tough-minded children's advocates and turn them into winning campaigns. We look to law enforcement, legal and medical experts, child protection professionals, and our membership to identify a pro-children, anti-crime agenda that truly matters for children. Together, these campaign initiatives make up the Promise to Protect—our legislative and policy agenda.

To advance the Promise to Protect, PROTECT's campaign staff, consultants, and National Advisory Board design and plan well-defined, winnable political campaigns, both nationally and in the individual states. We will use the proven tools of modern political campaigning—polling, direct mail, media, political contributions, and voter mobilization—to fight for children in a better, smarter way.

 


• Legal Representation:  Juveniles accused of committing crimes get legal representation. So do accused child molesters. But in most states, child victims of abuse are thrown into a high-stakes legal fight as the only party in the courtroom without competent legal support. And if they lose, they might be the only crime victim ordered to go home with their rapist. PROTECT believes that there is a role for volunteer advocates, but never as a substitute for actual legal representation or a way to cut criminal justice costs.

• Guarantee every child victim access to counseling and medical care:  Everyday, children who have been hurt and traumatized are forced to suffer further at the hands of government bureaucracies, often being denied the care they desperately need. Every child victim or alleged victim should have immediate and full access to mental health services and medical care, without undue delay, restriction or red tape.

• Reform court proceedings:  Prosecutors and child legal advocates have pointed to dozens of very specific reforms that can make criminal justice and court proceedings more child-friendly. Yet children continue to endure painful court delays, age-inappropriate questioning and intimidating courtroom procedures. PROTECT believes that court proceedings should be reformed now to help children—and prosecutors-—find justice.


Circle Of Trust

• Circle of Trust Campaign:  Studies show that 80-90% of children who are sexually abused are victimized by adults they know, not by strangers or kidnappers. These crimes—by family members, clergy, educators and predators in youth programs—take a horrible toll on children. The aftermath of these crimes will also take a tremendous toll on society, through crime and social problems later. PROTECT's Circle of Trust Campaign will continue our successful efforts to target state laws that decriminalize incest, while also working on other circle of trust crimes.

• Demand Accountability for Prosecutorial and Judicial Practices:  When they pursue crimes against children professionally and aggressively, prosecutors and judges are true heroes for kids. Too often however, prosecutors turn away from child abuse cases they see as challenging, time-consuming and low-profile... and judges become callous and cynical. As public servants and elected officials, prosecutors—and judges—have a duty to give crimes against our children their utmost priority, expertise and effort.

• Two Strikes You're Out:  Prosecutors can't always get a conviction the first time a predator is caught. But PROTECT believes that limits on plea and charge bargaining must be set! We are mounting a national petition drive and legislative campaigns to require serious imprisonment upon a second conviction for sexual molestation or other grievous injury to a child.

• Fight Child Pornography and Human Trafficking:  CIA and State Department reports say that international crime networks devoted to human trafficking are growing alarmingly. Production and distribution of child pornography has also become a global business. PROTECT is researching now how domestic political will can be focused to fight these evils.


• Promise to Protect Campaign:  The most difficult battles are usually for the things that cost money. But we are convinced that there are some things most Americans consider common sense and will support generously. When a child cries out for help or is thrust into a terrifying and confusing social welfare and criminal justice system, our sacred obligation is to provide that child with well-trained, competent help. If we fail at that, we fail the child. PROTECT is working on two simple initiatives that will improve child protection: aggressive recruitment of child protection professionals through student loan forgiveness programs (such as those available to corrections officers) and other incentives; and national or state training academies to teach both CPS and law enforcement professionals hard investigative skills.


• Expand Background Checks:  Simple statewide or national criminal background checks are not enough for those working with children. Most predators have victimized many children before they are ever caught. PROTECT is encouraging the use of CPS records and other registries and we want to increase requirements on child-serving agencies to conduct diligent background checks.

• Lifetime or Long-Term Intensive Supervision:  Sex offender registries provide only symbolic or marginal protection to communities, and research shows that treatment programs simply cannot "cure" child sexual offenders. If and when they are released from prison, these offenders should be subject to intensive parole or probation supervision for long periods of time, for the safety of children.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

These are Bills in Congress,  Please read and if you believe they are worthy contact your state's  Federal politicians to work on getting them passed.  Thank you

Currently in Committee sponsored By Sen Clinton has no co-sponsors yet



Child Welfare Workforce Improvement Act (Introduced in Senate)

S 2944 IS

110th CONGRESS2d Session

S. 2944

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to examine and improve the child welfare workforce, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 30, 2008

Mr. REID (for Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance


A BILL

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to examine and improve the child welfare workforce, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Child Welfare Workforce Improvement Act'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
      (1)(A) Research indicates that child welfare staff face a variety of obstacles that hinder their effective work with children and families in the child welfare system. These obstacles include barriers described in subparagraphs (B) through (D).
      (B) High caseload and high workload levels prevent child welfare staff from working intensively with children and families and monitoring their progress carefully.
      (C) Child welfare staff report a need for greater access to supervision, mentoring, and professional advancement. A lack of access to supervision, mentoring, and professional advancement contributes to staff burnout and turnover.
      (D) States report difficulty hiring and retaining quality child welfare staff. The average tenure of such a staff member is less than 2 years. In addition to increasing the cost of hiring and training new child welfare staff, high turnover rates among such staff are associated with multiple placements of children in foster care, longer lengths of stays in foster care, lower rates of permanency, and failed efforts at family reunification. Lengthy periods of foster care increase costs for child welfare agencies, as maintaining children in foster care is more expensive than adoption, reunification, or other permanency options.
      (2) Federal funding under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act for training of child welfare staff is limited. The related Federal funding procedures are linked to an outdated income eligibility requirement and administered in a way that fails to recognize the scope or types of staff who are working with children in the child welfare system.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 111 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106g) is amended--
      (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (6) as paragraphs (5) through (8), respectively; and
      (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
      `(3) the term `child welfare staff' means--
        `(A) employees of State and local child welfare agencies, who are working with children and families that have contact with such a child welfare agency, in order to promote safety, permanence, and well-being for children and families; and
        `(B) employees of State-licensed or State-approved nonprofit private agencies, who are working with children and families that have contact with a State or local child welfare agency in order to promote safety, permanence, and well-being for children and families;
      `(4) the term `related professionals', used with respect to child welfare staff, means--
        `(A) legal staff, working with children and families that have contact with a State or local child welfare agency, including judges, attorneys, guardians ad litem, and court appointed special advocates; and
        `(B) individuals employed by public or nonprofit private agencies in child - and family-serving fields including education, health, mental health, substance abuse prevention and treatment, juvenile justice, and domestic violence services, who work with children and families that have contact with a State or local child welfare agency;'.

SEC. 4. DATA COLLECTION AND RESEARCH TO INCREASE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN.

    The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act is amended by inserting after section 104 (42 U.S.C. 5105) the following:

`SEC. 104A. DATA COLLECTION AND RESEARCH TO INCREASE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN.

    `(a) National Child Welfare Staff Study-
      `(1) STUDY AND REPORT- The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences, under which the National Academy of Sciences shall--
        `(A) conduct a national study of child welfare staff to--
          `(i) examine and provide findings related to the demographic and other characteristics of child welfare staff, including salaries, academic degrees held, training received, and turnover;
          `(ii) examine and provide findings regarding factors contributing to child welfare staff turnover and strategies that have been effective in reducing the turnover;
          `(iii)(I) examine and provide findings regarding strengths and challenges present in the working relationship between child welfare staff and related professionals; and
          `(II) make recommendations regarding how this working relationship may be improved;
          `(iv) examine and provide findings, and make recommendations, regarding appropriate overall workloads and caseloads for all child welfare staff, including appropriate workloads and caseloads for supervisors, analyzed by type of child welfare staff member supervised, and appropriate measurement of such overall workloads and caseloads;
          `(v)(I) examine and provide findings related to policy and practice regarding education level and training requirements for child welfare staff; and
          `(II) make recommendations regarding appropriate education levels and training to ensure competent child welfare staff; and
          `(vi)(I) examine and provide findings related to the kinds of data available to or collected by State or local child welfare agencies with regard to child welfare staff;
          `(II) examine the methods and kinds of data on child welfare staff that States report to the Secretary through the data collection systems authorized under section 103(c)(1)(C), section 477(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(f)), and section 479 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 679);
          `(III) make recommendations on how States might collect data on child welfare staff, and report the data to the Secretary, regularly and in a manner that enables the data to be linked to the outcomes achieved for individual children served by the State or local child welfare agency involved, which shall include--
            `(aa) a means of incorporating the data into the data collection system authorized under section 479 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 679); and
            `(bb) as appropriate, a means of linking the data to the information collected through the data collection systems authorized under section 103(c)(1)(C) and under section 477(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(f)); and
          `(IV) examine and provide findings regarding the impact of data collection procedures and requirements on child welfare staff, and make recommendations for collecting data on child welfare staff in such a way that the attention and time of child welfare staff are not diverted from providing services to children and families in order to meet data collection requirements; and
        `(B) not later that 18 months after the date on which the Secretary and the National Academy of Sciences enter into the agreement, submit a report containing the results of the study, including the findings and recommendations described in subparagraph (A), to the Secretary.
      `(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS- Not later than 3 months after receiving the report submitted under paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall transmit the report to the appropriate committees of Congress, along with a description of how the Secretary plans to consult with State administrators, child welfare staff, and other appropriate stakeholders to issue the proposed regulations described in subsection (b)(1).
      `(3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1), $5,000,000 for fiscal years 2009 through 2013.
    `(b) Collection and Reporting of Data on Child Welfare Staff-
      `(1) PROPOSED REGULATIONS- The Secretary shall consult with State administrators, child welfare staff, and other appropriate stakeholders and, not later than 12 months after receiving the report described in subsection (a)(1)(B), shall issue proposed regulations, which shall--
        `(A) be based on the recommendations of the report; and
        `(B) require States to collect data on child welfare staff, and report the data to the Secretary, regularly and in a manner that enables the data to be linked to the outcomes achieved for individual children served by the State or local child welfare agency involved, which shall include--
          `(i) a means of incorporating the data into the data collection system authorized under section 479 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 679); and
          `(ii) as appropriate, a means of linking the data to the information collected through the data collection systems authorized under section 103(c)(1)(C) and under section 477(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(f)).
      `(2) FINAL REGULATIONS- Not later than 2 years after receiving the report described in subsection (a)(1)(B), the Secretary shall issue final regulations that meet the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1).'.

SEC. 5. REMOVAL OF BARRIERS TO PROVIDING TRAINING FOR CHILD WELFARE STAFF AND RELATED PROFESSIONALS UNDER PARTS B AND E OF TITLE IV OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

    (a) Removal of Certain Funding Restrictions-
      (1) IN GENERAL- Section 474 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 672) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    `(g) Training Expenditures To Develop and Improve the Child Welfare Workforce-
      `(1) DE-LINKING OF AFDC ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- The Secretary shall treat as necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the State plan all expenditures by a State for training activities described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(3) without regard to whether individuals participating in such activities include individuals providing services or treatment to foster or adoptive children other than those on behalf of whom foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments may be made under this part.
      `(2) TRAINING RELATED TO SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES THAT HAVE CONTACT WITH THE STATE AGENCY OR THE LOCAL AGENCY ADMINISTERING A STATE PLAN- The Secretary shall treat as necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the State plan all expenditures by the State for training activities described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(3) without regard to whether such training covers services, programs, and activities carried out under the State plan approved under this part or the State plans approved under part B.
      `(3) REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION ON FUNDING STATE SHARE FROM PRIVATE SOURCES FOR EXPENDITURES FOR TRAINING PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS- With respect to expenditures by a State for short- and long-term training at educational institutions through grants to such institutions or by direct financial assistance to students enrolled in such institutions for which Federal payments are provided under subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(3) funds from private nonprofit educational institutions may be considered as the State's share in claiming Federal reimbursement for such expenditures without regard to any requirement that the funds--
        `(A) be transferred to the State or local agency and under its administrative control;
        `(B) be donated without any restriction which would require their use for the training of a particular individual or at particular facilities or institutions; or
        `(C) do not revert to the private source's facility or use.'.
      (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS- Section 474(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 674(a)(3)) is amended--
        (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting `subsection (g) and' before `section 472(i)';
        (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking `per centum' and inserting `percent'; and
        (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking `receiving assistance under this part'.
    (b) Definition of Child Welfare Staff and Related Professionals- Section 474(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 674(a)(3)) is amended--
      (1) in subparagraph (A)--
        (A) by striking `personnel' and inserting `child welfare staff (as such term is defined in section 111 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106g))'; and
        (B) by inserting `or by State-licensed or State-approved nonprofit private agencies,' after `political subdivision,'; and
      (2) in subparagraph (B) (as amended by subsection (a)(2)(C))--
        (A) by inserting `(i)' after `(B)';
        (B) by striking `current or prospective foster or adoptive parents and the members of the staff of State-licensed or State-approved child care institutions providing care to foster and adopted children, in ways that increase the ability of such current or prospective parents, staff members, and institutions' and inserting `child welfare staff (as so defined), current or prospective foster or adoptive parents, and the members of the staff of State-licensed or State-approved child care institutions providing care to foster and adopted children, in ways that increase the ability of such staff, current or prospective parents, and institutions';
        (C) by adding `and' after `contract,'; and
        (D) by adding at the end the following new subclause:
        `(ii) 75 percent of so much of such expenditures as are for the short-term training of related professionals (as such term is defined in section 111 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106g)) to the extent that such training pertains to the way in which those related professionals work with children and families that have contact with the State agency or the local agency administering the plan in the political subdivision,'.
    (c) State Plan Requirement for Annual Evaluation and Assessment of Training and Staff Development Activities Under Parts B and E- Section 471(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 671(a)(7)) is amended--
      (1) by striking `will monitor' and inserting `will--
        `(A) monitor';
      (2) by adding `and' after the semicolon; and
      (3) by adding the following new subparagraph:
        `(B) with respect to training activities for which Federal payments are provided under subparagraph (A) or (B) of 474(a)(3), establish and maintain a plan for evaluation of such activities, and of the child welfare services staff development and training conducted by the State in accordance with section 422(b)(4)(B), that includes at least an annual assessment of the nature of the such activities and such staff development and training, the types of staff trained and developed, and the intended and actual impact of the training and staff development activities on participating staff, and on children and families;'.
    (d) Effective Date-
      (1) IN GENERAL- The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter that begins on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether regulations to implement the amendment are promulgated by such date.
      (2) DELAY PERMITTED IF STATE LEGISLATION REQUIRED- In the case of a State plan approved under section 471 of the Social Security Act which requires State legislation (other than legislation appropriating funds) in order for the plan to meet the additional requirements imposed by the amendment made by subsection (a) of this section, the State plan shall not be regarded as failing to comply with the additional requirements solely on the basis of the failure of the plan to meet the additional requirements before the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning after the close of the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. For purposes of the previous sentence, in the case of a State that has a 2-year legislative session, each year of such session shall be deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legislature.

      ***************************************************************

S.1296
Title: A bill to provide enhanced Federal enforcement and assistance in preventing and prosecuting crimes of violence against children.
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] (introduced 5/3/2007)      Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 5/3/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


All Information (except text)Text of Legislation CRS Summary Major Congressional Actions

All Congressional Actions

All Congressional Actions with Amendments
With links to Congressional Record pages, votes,reports
Titles Cosponsors (2) Committees
Related Bills Amendments Related Committee Documents
CBO Cost Estimates Subjects  

This deal with the rape of young children
Bill 792 of 1000

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit the penalty of death for the rape of a child. (Introduced in House)

HJ 96 IH

110th CONGRESS2d Session

H. J. RES. 96

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit the penalty of death for the rape of a child .

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 26, 2008

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. KELLER of Florida, Mr. FEENEY, and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit the penalty of death for the rape of a child .

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article --

    `The penalty of death for the forcible rape of a child who has not attained the age of 12 years does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.'.
H.J.RES.96
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit the penalty of death for the rape of a child.
Sponsor: Rep Chabot, Steve [OH-1] (introduced 6/26/2008)      Cosponsors (15)
Related Bills: H.J.RES.82H.J.RES.83S.RES.626
Latest Major Action: 6/26/2008 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
COSPONSORS(15), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:     (Sort: by date)

Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] - 7/17/2008Rep Bishop, Rob [UT-1] - 7/17/2008
Rep Blunt, Roy [MO-7] - 7/9/2008Rep Boehner, John A. [OH-8] - 7/9/2008
Rep Burgess, Michael C. [TX-26] - 7/8/2008Rep Coble, Howard [NC-6] - 7/23/2008
Rep English, Phil [PA-3] - 7/8/2008Rep Feeney, Tom [FL-24] - 6/26/2008
Rep Jordan, Jim [OH-4] - 7/8/2008Rep Keller, Ric [FL-8] - 6/26/2008
Rep Latta, Robert E. [OH-5] - 7/17/2008Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 7/17/2008
Rep McHenry, Patrick T. [NC-10] - 7/17/2008Rep Scalise, Steve [LA-1] - 7/17/2008
Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] - 6/26/2008




 
GPO's PDF DisplayCongressional Record ReferencesBill Summary & Status

Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by Senate)

S 1965 ES

110th CONGRESS2d Session

S. 1965

S. 1965

AN ACT

AN ACT

To protect children from cybercrimes, including crimes by online predators, to enhance efforts to identify and eliminate child pornography, and to help parents shield their children from material that is inappropriate for minors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) SHORT TITLE- This Act may be cited as the `Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act'.
    (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
      Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

TITLE I--PROMOTING A SAFE INTERNET FOR CHILDREN

      Sec. 101. Internet safety.
      Sec. 102. Public awareness campaign.
      Sec. 103. Annual reports.
      Sec. 104. Online safety and technology working group.
      Sec. 105. Promoting online safety in schools.
      Sec. 106. Definitions.

TITLE II--ENHANCING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ENFORCEMENT

      Sec. 201. Child pornography prevention; forfeitures related to child pornography violations.

TITLE I--PROMOTING A SAFE INTERNET FOR CHILDREN

SEC. 101. INTERNET SAFETY.

    For the purposes of this title, the issue of Internet safety includes issues regarding the use of the Internet in a manner that promotes safe online activity for children, protects children from cybercrimes, including crimes by online predators, and helps parents shield their children from material that is inappropriate for minors.

SEC. 102. PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.

    The Federal Trade Commission shall carry out a nationwide program to increase public awareness and provide education regarding strategies to promote the safe use of the Internet by children. The program shall utilize existing resources and efforts of the Federal Government, State and local governments, nonprofit organizations, private technology and financial companies, Internet service providers, World Wide Web-based resources, and other appropriate entities, that includes--
      (1) identifying, promoting, and encouraging best practices for Internet safety;
      (2) establishing and carrying out a national outreach and education campaign regarding Internet safety utilizing various media and Internet-based resources;
      (3) facilitating access to, and the exchange of, information regarding Internet safety to promote up-to-date knowledge regarding current issues; and
      (4) facilitating access to Internet safety education and public awareness efforts the Commission considers appropriate by States, units of local government, schools, police departments, nonprofit organizations, and other appropriate entities.

SEC. 103. ANNUAL REPORTS.

    The Commission shall submit a report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation not later than March 31 of each year that describes the activities carried out under section 102 by the Commission during the preceding calendar year.

SEC. 104. ONLINE SAFETY AND TECHNOLOGY WORKING GROUP.

    (a) ESTABLISHMENT- Within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information shall establish an Online Safety and Technology working group comprised of representatives of relevant sectors of the business community, public interest groups, and other appropriate groups and Federal agencies to review and evaluate--
      (1) the status of industry efforts to promote online safety through educational efforts, parental control technology, blocking and filtering software, age-appropriate labels for content or other technologies or initiatives designed to promote a safe online environment for children;
      (2) the status of industry efforts to promote online safety among providers of electronic communications services and remote computing services by reporting apparent child pornography under section 13032 of title 42, United States Code, including amendments made by this Act with respect to the content of such reports and any obstacles to such reporting;
      (3) the practices of electronic communications service providers and remote computing service providers related to record retention in connection with crimes against children; and
      (4) the development of technologies to help parents shield their children from inappropriate material on the Internet.
    (b) REPORT- Within 1 year after the working group is first convened, it shall submit a report to the Assistant Secretary and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation that--
      (1) describes in detail its findings, including any information related to the effectiveness of such strategies and technologies and any information about the prevalence within industry of educational campaigns, parental control technologies, blocking and filtering software, labeling, or other technologies to assist parents; and
      (2) includes recommendations as to what types of incentives could be used or developed to increase the effectiveness and implementation of such strategies and technologies.
    (c) FACA NOT TO APPLY TO WORKING GROUP- The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the working group.

SEC. 105. PROMOTING ONLINE SAFETY IN SCHOOLS.

    Section 254(h)(5)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(5)(b)) is amended--
      (1) by striking `and' after the semicolon in clause (i);
      (2) by striking `minors.' in clause (ii) and inserting `minors; and'; and
      (3) by adding at the end the following:
          `(iii) as part of its Internet safety policy is educating minors about appropriate online behavior, including interacting with other individuals on social networking websites and in chat rooms and cyberbullying awareness and response.'.

SEC. 106. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title:
      (1) COMMISSION- The term `Commission' means the Federal Trade Commission.
      (2) INTERNET- The term `Internet' means collectively the myriad of computer and telecommunications facilities, including equipment and operating software, which comprise the interconnected world-wide network of networks that employ the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol, or any predecessor successor protocols to such protocol, to communicate information of all kinds by wire or radio.

TITLE II--ENHANCING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ENFORCEMENT

SEC. 201. CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION; FORFEITURES RELATED TO CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VIOLATIONS.

    (a) In General- Section 503(b)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1)) is amended--
      (1) by striking `or' after the semicolon in subparagraph (C);
      (2) by striking `or 1464' in subparagraph (D) and inserting `1464, or 2252';
      (3) by inserting `or' after the semicolon in subparagraph (D); and
      (4) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
      `(E) violated any provision of section 227 of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13032);'.

Passed the Senate May 22, 2008.

Attest:

Secretary.
Sen Bond, Christopher S. [MO] - 9/19/2007Sen Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD] - 1/22/2008
Sen Cochran, Thad [MS] - 9/27/2007Sen Coleman, Norm [MN] - 11/15/2007
Sen Hagel, Chuck [NE] - 10/2/2007Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] - 10/15/2007
Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] - 8/2/2007Sen Inouye, Daniel K. [HI] - 8/2/2007
Sen Kerry, John F. [MA] - 9/27/2007Sen Klobuchar, Amy [MN] - 11/8/2007
Sen Lincoln, Blanche L. [AR] - 12/3/2007Sen Murkowski, Lisa [AK] - 9/27/2007
Sen Nelson, Bill [FL] - 8/2/2007Sen Pryor, Mark L. [AR] - 8/2/2007
Sen Roberts, Pat [KS] - 11/15/2007Sen Rockefeller, John D., IV [WV] - 8/3/2007
Sen Smith, Gordon H. [OR] - 11/7/2007Sen Snowe, Olympia J. [ME] - 9/27/2007
Sen Thune, John [SD] - 9/24/2007Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 9/25/2007
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

H.R.3845
Title: To establish a Special Counsel for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction within the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, to improve the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, to increase resources for regional computer forensic labs, and to make other improvements to increase the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute child predators.
Sponsor: Rep Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [FL-20] (introduced 10/16/2007)      Cosponsors (38)
Related Bills: S.1738S.2237
Latest Major Action: 11/15/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
H.R.3845
Title: To establish a Special Counsel for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction within the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, to improve the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, to increase resources for regional computer forensic labs, and to make other improvements to increase the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute child predators.
Sponsor: Rep Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [FL-20] (introduced 10/16/2007)      Cosponsors (38)
Related Bills: S.1738S.2237
Latest Major Action: 11/15/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


COSPONSORS(38), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:     (Sort: by date)

Rep Allen, Thomas H. [ME-1] - 10/16/2007Rep Arcuri, Michael A. [NY-24] - 10/16/2007
Rep Barton, Joe [TX-6] - 10/16/2007Rep Bean, Melissa L. [IL-8] - 10/16/2007
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] - 10/25/2007Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [GA-2] - 10/16/2007
Rep Bishop, Timothy H. [NY-1] - 10/16/2007Rep Bordallo, Madeleine Z. [GU] - 10/25/2007
Rep DeGette, Diana [CO-1] - 10/16/2007Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 10/25/2007
Rep Edwards, Chet [TX-17] - 10/16/2007Rep Ellsworth, Brad [IN-8] - 10/16/2007
Rep Emanuel, Rahm [IL-5] - 10/16/2007Rep Gerlach, Jim [PA-6] - 11/6/2007
Rep Giffords, Gabrielle [AZ-8] - 10/16/2007Rep Hill, Baron P. [IN-9] - 10/25/2007
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 10/16/2007Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 10/16/2007
Rep Kagen, Steve [WI-8] - 10/30/2007Rep Klein, Ron [FL-22] - 10/16/2007
Rep Lewis, John [GA-5] - 10/25/2007Rep Matheson, Jim [UT-2] - 10/16/2007
Rep McCaul, Michael T. [TX-10] - 10/30/2007Rep McNerney, Jerry [CA-11] - 10/16/2007
Rep Moore, Dennis [KS-3] - 10/16/2007Rep Murphy, Patrick J. [PA-8] - 10/16/2007
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 10/16/2007Rep Oberstar, James L. [MN-8] - 10/16/2007
Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. [TX-27] - 10/16/2007Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND] - 10/16/2007
Rep Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch [MD-2] - 10/16/2007Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 10/16/2007
Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4] - 10/16/2007Rep Shuler, Heath [NC-11] - 10/16/2007
Rep Space, Zachary T. [OH-18] - 10/16/2007Rep Sutton, Betty [OH-13] - 10/16/2007
Rep Tauscher, Ellen O. [CA-10] - 10/16/2007Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 10/25/2007



 
sfv letterhead


Hello Stop Family Violence Activists!

As many of you know, there is a crisis in our nation's family courts, where misguided judges are awarding child custody to abusers.  The following case epitomizes the problem - and with your help, we'll be able to help this courageous family while raising awareness and bringing this issue to national attention. 

******

Click Here to View Full SizeFourteen years ago, in a desperate and courageous act to protect her children from abuse, Holly Collins "went underground" and fled the country with her three young children after the Minneapolis Family Court ruled that they must live with their father, who had fractured Zachary's skull.  Now Holly and her adult children want to come home - but the Minneapolis District Attorney refuses to drop the charges, and has threatened to try to put Holly in jail and deny her all contact with her children the minute she sets foot on U.S. soil. 

YOU CAN HELP!

Visit www.stopfamilyviolence.org/520  to send a free, pre-written message to the Minneapolis District Attorney, the Minnesota Attorney General and the Minnesota Governor, urging them to drop the charges against Holly, so that she and her children can return to the United States and live their lives in peace.

 

OUR STORY
by Jennifer Collins

To Whom It May Concern:
My mother is a formerly battered woman who is the first American to receive asylum in Europe. My brother and I were abused children who were failed by the American Justice System, but fortunately we received asylum in the Netherlands.
Click Here to View Full SizeWe are from Minneapolis Minnesota. In 1992 custody of my brother (9) and I (7) was reversed to my abusive father because my mother denied visitation. In 1994 she ‘kidnapped’ us back and went underground. We fled the United States and were apprehended in The Netherlands for having inadequate traveling documentation. After living in refugee camps for 3 years, we were finally granted asylum in 1997. We have been living (in secrecy) in Europe for 13 years. In May 2007 we were discovered by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. We are trying to get the charges dismissed so we can return home safely to the United States of America.

Our mother lived a horrible life as a victim of terrible violence: from severe beatings as a child, sexual abuse as a teenage girl and the systematic physical and emotional abuse of being a young, battered wife. After two decades of being beaten, raped, tortured, demoralized, criticized and even blamed for accepting the violence, she finally got up the courage to leave her abusive life when my father fractured my brother's skull. (He was only 4 years old!) Child Protection threatened my mother that we would be removed from her care and she could face charges of “failure to protect” if she didn’t leave my father. Yet once she left, the case was remanded to the Family Court and our young mother (22) was thrown into an outrageous legal battle of ’he said / she said.’

The family court case dragged on for years and during this time, my father continued to beat my mother (in front of us) when he picked us up for court ordered visitation. During the visitation… he beat, punched, kicked, tortured and tormented me (7) and my brother (9.) We would cry and beg our mother not to send us. My father would call the police to enforce visitation and we would be physically dragged out from underneath our beds and given to this man who was hurting us. Rather than accept that our mother was advocating on behalf of her abused children, she was accused of “Parental Alienation” and interfering with our father’s "Rights of Access.”

There was an abundance of evidence regarding the abuse: visible injuries, medical records, psychological evaluations, police reports, child abuse investigations, witness statements, etc… My father testified on several occasions that he hurt my mother (admittedly in the presence of us children) which required emergency medical care, but that every single incident and injury was an “accident.” The judge even found that domestic violence occurred, but personally decided that our mother was too traumatized from the abuse to care for her own children. On the record the judge admitted that he personally couldn’t understand my mother’s fear of my father: “I’ve seen them and I’ve seen her in Court. I thought they had just separated and that he had just beat her with a belt and put her in the hospital because she was shaking like a little bird, and then I find out that they had been separated for a number of years, and it wasn’t the behavior of a person that had been separated from a man for a number of years.” He concluded that she must be suffering from a mental illness, although he wasn’t sure what ‘psychiatric affliction’ she had. Every single medical and psychological professional involved in our case denied this! The judge decided that it was easier to monitor my father’s physical abuse than the potential physiological harm from having a “broken” mother and he awarded the known abuser custody of two young children!
Click Here to View Full Size
The court officers literally ripped me out of my mother’s arms as I was kicking and screaming “MOMMY HELP ME! HE HURTS ME AND HE HURTS MY BROTHER! MOMMY…. I WANT MY MOMMY!” The memories of that dreadful day still bring tears to my eyes. I will be haunted by that moment for the rest of my life!

My mother kept fighting for our return and stressed that children should have rights too! The right to be safe! However the judge tried to silence her and a “Gag Order” was issued. My mother was warned that she would not be allowed to see her children as long as she continued to speak out against the court. A family court worker told us kids that we would not be able to see our mom until we stopped saying that our father was still beating us (which he was.) When we were finally allowed to have (supervised) visitation with our mother, I showed the visitation supervisors the bruises on my back and bottom. I told them “He’s still hurting us!” The county supervisor scolded me saying: “You know you are not allowed to talk about those kinds of things anymore!” I was told to cover up immediately or we would be taken out of the room and we would not be allowed to see our mom anymore. The judge issued a subpoena for our pediatrician to be held in contempt until he apologized to the court for accusing the judge of not protecting us. Even though the Judge claimed that my mother was a ‘danger’ to my big brother and me, he awarded sole custody of our baby brother, Christopher, to my mother in 1994! It is all too strange for words!

After trying every legal possibility to secure our safety, on June 30th 1994 this brave woman “kidnapped” us children right out from underneath her abuser. Please note that we voluntarily went with our mother! It was one of the happiest days of our lives! We went “underground” and eventually fled the United States in 1994. (Apparently the Judge reversed custody of Christopher as well, after we left.) After spending 3 years in various refugee camps our shy, petite, young mom won her case under the High Commission for Refugees and was the first American Citizen granted Asylum in the European Union! (My brothers and I also received our own asylum.)

Although we were always afraid of being caught, we finally found sanctuary and slowly but surely began to heal from the abuse. Now my brother and I are in University and thriving! Christopher is in High school and doing very well. After 13 years of living in secrecy, we were found in the Netherlands by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation in May 2007. While the U.S. has agreed to drop all federal charges against us, the Hennepin County Attorney is determined to prosecute my mother! My mother was told that she needed to turn herself in and accept her punishment! My mother is a sweet, soft woman. She is terrified of getting ‘in trouble’ and going to jail. She has been mistreated her whole life. It is time for her to have peace!

Click Here to View Full SizeMy brother is 24 and I am 22. We are the “victims!” We want to be heard! We don’t think that our mother should be punished nor silenced any longer. We want to expose the injustice, help rectify the inadequacies of family court and find a way to insure the protection of bruised and beaten and children. First we need to help our own mother who faces criminal charges for protecting us. Surely it is an affirmative defense that she reasonably believed that she was protecting us, when the judge even found in a court order that my father was abusive!

It is quite remarkable that this shy, insecure, defeated, battered, young woman was the first American to receive asylum in Europe! It is embarrassing that our country fails to protect the most vulnerable citizens! Things need to change! We need to make a difference! We would appreciate any help you can give.

Sincerely,
Jennifer

YOU CAN HELP!

Visit www.stopfamilyviolence.org/520  to send a free, pre-written message to the Minneapolis District Attorney, the Minnesota Attorney General and the Minnesota Governor, urging them to drop the charges against Holly, so that she and her children can return to the United States and live their lives in peace.

Please forward this message to as many people as you can.

Together, we can.. www.stopfamilyviolence.org

Irene Weiser

Copywrite and Fair Use information

Who to Contact in Congress

Sign my Guestbook

Please email admin at defend_children@yahoo.com if you wish to join or to correspond with us.  Also if you would like to give suggestions or ask questions please email us.  Thank you

coa.jpg

This site  The Web