|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Baptist on Incest
Sin and the sanctity of human life
In Leviticus 18, God clearly states his hatred of incest. He points out that incestuous relationships typified the degradation
of the societies God was driving out before the Israelites and actually defiled the very land they lived in. Israelites who
practiced incest were to be cut off from their people. The Apostle Paul in his letter to a New Testament church (1 Corinthians
5) presents a parallel idea. The brother involved in an incestuous affair was to be handed over to Satan - cut off from the
church until he truly repented.
According to the same Mosaic law, the raping of a married or engaged woman was punishable by death.
(God does not, however condemn the woman who is truly innocent - the one who cries out to no avail, Deuteronomy 22:23-27.)
If an unmarried woman was raped, the man was to marry her and provide for her as long as he lived (Deut. 22:28-29).
Clearly, God detests rape and incest, as well as any other form of sexual immorality. Yet nowhere does
He condemn the offspring of sexual immorality.4 Rather, they are the recipients of blessing. Moab and Ben-ammi,
the sons of Lot and his daughters, grew into mighty nations. Perez, the son of Judah and his daughter-in-law, stands in the
blessing on Ruth and in the genealogy of Christ. In fact, God stresses the principle that "Fathers shall not be put to death
for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin" (Deut. 24:16). |

Catholicism on Incest(Latin in, not, and castus, chaste). Incest is sexual intercourse between those who are related by blood or marriage. Its specific malice is contracted by such unlawful commerce
between those related within the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity, as computed by canonists. The guilt is incurred
not only by those sinful acts which are, as theologians say, fully consummated, but also by incomplete acts.
The particular deformity of
incest comes not merely from the violation of the virtue of chastity, but also from the offence against the mingled affection
and reverence with which parents and, proportionately, other relatives should be regarded. It is certain that this crime has its distinctive enormity from
the prohibition of the natural law, where there is question of the first degree in the
direct line, for instance, between parents and children. For the other degrees it is probable
that recourse must be had to the ecclesiastical law which invalidates marriage within those limits. It is commonly held, with regard to those related by consanguinity or affinity, that with the exception of the first degree in the
direct line all forms of incest are, morally speaking, of the same species, and therefore for the integrity of confession there is no necessity to distinguish between them. It must be noted, however,
that carnal sins between those who are spiritually or legally related within the degrees that would render their marriage
invalid, are separate species of incest.
A decree of the Holy Office, 25 June, 1885, declares that
in applications for matrimonial dispensations it is no longer necessary to make mention of the circumstance of incest
relations between the petitioners.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
 |
|
Rape & Incest: Islamic Perspective Uzma Mazhar
Incest and rape are not new in this day and age; these problems have always existed and will
continue to exist if not confronted face on. If you have ever worked with an incest, sexual abuse or rape
survivor you will never be able to forget the devastating impact it has on all aspects of their life, nor will you be able
to sit back and do nothing about this issue. These are serious crimes that corrode the fabric of family
and society and cannot go un-addressed, since these problems do exist in Muslim families it is about time that we address
it openly and take action to put an end to it. <O:P> </O:P> To fully understand this issue we need to examine what Islâm teaches us about the value of human life.<O:P>
</O:P> Islâm views human life as a sacred gift from God. The Qur’ân
repeatedly stresses the sanctity of life (hurmat al hayat). The life of every single individual regardless of gender, age,
nationality or religion is worthy of respect. In verses referring to the sanctity of life, the term used
is ‘nafs’ (soul, life); and there is no distinction made in that soul being young or old, male or female, Muslim
or non-muslim. <O:P> </O:P> Sûrah al An'am
6.151: "Do not take any human being's life, (the life) which God has declared to be sacred - otherwise than
in (the pursuit of) justice: this has He enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason." (Also check: Sûrah
al Isra 17.33 & Sûrah al Ma'idah 5.32)<O:P> </O:P> Qur’ânic
teachings encompass every aspect of life; hence it does not limit the definition of life to the physical body only, but includes
the mental, emotional and spiritual aspects as well. There are about 150 verses that define the term ‘nafs’
in various ways making it clear that the concept of ‘life’ is not limited to mere physical existence.<O:P>
</O:P> Historically, Islam has addressed serious issues openly and sought to
correct actions that constitute harm or ‘zulm’ (ie: cruelty and abuse) to the dignity of humankind.
Human life and respect for it has been stressed unstintingly, regardless of age or gender. As a
general rule, Islâm forbids all ‘zulm’, be it physical, mental, emotional or spiritual:<O:P> </O:P> Sûrah al An'am 6.120 ”Abandon all harm (ithm), whether committed openly or in secret.” (Check Sûrah al A`raf 7:33)<O:P> </O:P> Sûrah al 49:11-12
points out categorically that emotionally abusive language and behavior is not acceptable. "You who believe do not
let one (set of) people make fun of another set. Do not defame one another. Do not insult by using nicknames. And do not backbite
or speak ill of one another."<O:P> </O:P> In the last address to
his community, the Prophet (saw) said: "Your lives and properties are forbidden to one another till you meet your Lord
on the Day of Resurrection… Regard the life and property of every Muslim as a sacred trust… Hurt no one so that
no one may hurt you... You will neither inflict nor suffer any inequity." The Prophet (saw) did not
prohibit only the unlawful encroachment of one another’s life and property, but also honor and respect. <O:P>
</O:P> Considering that human life is to be valued and cruelty is forbidden,
what is the Islamic perspective on incest and rape?<O:P> </O:P> According
to Islâm, a woman has to be respected and protected under all circumstances, whether she belongs to your own nation
or to the nation of an enemy, whether she follows your religion or belongs to some other religion or has no religion at all.
A Muslim cannot outrage her under any circumstances. All promiscuous relationships have been forbidden
to him, irrespective of the status or position of the woman, whether the woman is a willing or an unwilling partner to the
act. The words of the Holy Qur’ân in this respect are: "Do not approach (the bounds of) adultery" (17:32).
Heavy punishment has been prescribed for this crime, and the order has not been qualified by any conditions. Since the violation
of chastity of a woman is forbidden in Islam, a Muslim who perpetrates this crime cannot escape punishment. (Maudoodi)<O:P>
</O:P> The Quran has, in various ways and in different contexts; impressed
on men that they must observe the limits set by God (Hudûd Allah) in respect to women and must not encroach upon their
rights in either marriage or divorce. In all situations it is the men who are reminded, corrected and reprimanded, over and
over again, to be generous to women and to be kind, compassionate, fair and just in their dealings with women.
Even in divorce, when the chances of anger and vindictiveness are high, it is stressed that men are to separate with
grace, equity and generosity.<O:P> </O:P> Forbidding cruelty against
children and women is apparent from rulings against female infanticide and rights of inheritance given even to an unborn child;
and the kindness mandated even when divorcing your wife. There are numerous ahâdîth about the
rights of children to respect and dignity. The same holds true for respect and the unprecedented rights
given to women. <O:P> Relevant verses from the Quran: Sûrah an Nâs 4.119 'O you who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will...' Sûrah an Nûr 24.33 '... And do not, in order to gain some of the fleeting pleasures
of this worldly life, coerce your slave women into whoredom if they are desirous of marriage, and if anyone should coerce
them, then, verily, after they have been compelled (to submit in their helplessness), God will be much forgiving, a dispenser
of grace (to them).</O:P> During the time of the Prophet (saw) punishment
was inflicted on the rapist on the solitary evidence of the woman who was raped by him. Wa'il ibn Hujr
reports of an incident when a woman was raped. Later, when some people came by, she identified and accused
the man of raping her. They seized him and brought him to Allah's messenger, who said to the woman,
"Go away, for Allâh has forgiven you," but of the man who had raped her, he said, "Stone him to death."
(Tirmidhi and Abu Dawud) During the time when Umar (raa) was the Khalifah, a woman
accused his son Abu Shahmah of raping her; she brought the infant borne of this incident with her to the mosque and publicly
spoke about what had happened. Umar (raa) asked his son who acknowledged committing the crime and was duly
punished right there and then. There was no punishment given to the woman. (Rauf)<O:P> </O:P> Islamic legal scholars interpret rape as a crime in the category of Hiraba. In ‘Fiqh-us-Sunnah’,
hiraba is described as: ‘a single person or group of people causing public disruption, killing, forcibly taking property
or money, attacking or raping women (hatk al ‘arad), killing cattle, or disrupting agriculture.’<O:P> </O:P> The famous jurist, Ibn Hazm, had the widest definition of hiraba, defining a hiraba offender as: ‘One
who puts people in fear on the road, whether or not with a weapon, at night or day, in urban areas or in open spaces, in the
palace of a caliph or a mosque, with or without accomplices, in the desert or in the village, in a large or small city, with
one or more people… making people fear that they’ll be killed, or have money taken, or be raped (hatk al ‘arad)…
whether the attackers are one or many."<O:P> </O:P> Al-Dasuqi held
that if a person forced a woman to have sex, his actions would be deemed as committing hiraba. In addition, the Maliki judge
Ibn ‘Arabi, relates a story in which a group was attacked and a woman in their party was raped. Responding to
the argument that the crime did not constitute hiraba because no money was taken and no weapons used, Ibn ‘Arabi replied
indignantly that "hiraba with the private parts" is much worse than hiraba involving the taking of money, and that
anyone would rather be subjected to the latter than the former.<O:P> </O:P> The
crime of rape is classified not as a subcategory of ‘zina’ (consensual adultery), but rather as a separate crime
of violence under hiraba. This classification is logical, as the "taking" is of the victim’s property (the
rape victim’s sexual autonomy) by force. In Islam, sexual autonomy and pleasure is a fundamental right for both women
and men (Ghazâlî); taking by force someone’s right to control the sexual activity of one’s body is
thus a form of hiraba. <O:P> </O:P> Rape
as hiraba is a violent crime that uses sexual intercourse as a weapon. The focus in a hiraba prosecution is the accused rapist
and his intent and physical actions, and not second-guessing the consent of the rape victim. Hiraba does
not require four witnesses to prove the offense, circumstantial evidence, medical data and expert testimony form the evidence
used to prosecute such crimes. Islamic legal responses to rape are not limited to
a criminal prosecution for hiraba. Islamic jurisprudence also provides an avenue for civil redress for a rape survivor in
its law of "jirah" (wounds). Islamic law designates ownership rights to each part of one’s body, and a right
to corresponding compensation for any harm done unlawfully to any of those parts. Islamic law calls this the ‘law of
jirah’ (wounds). Harm to a sexual organ, therefore, entitles the person harmed to appropriate financial compensation
under classical Islamic jirah jurisprudence. Each school of Islamic law has held that where a woman is harmed through
sexual intercourse (some include marital intercourse), she is entitled to financial compensation for the harm. Further, where
this intercourse was without the consent of the woman, the perpetrator must pay the woman both the basic compensation for
the harm, as well as an additional amount based on the ‘diyya’ (financial compensation for murder, akin to a wrongful
death payment).<O:P> </O:P> Islamic law, with its radical introduction
of a woman’s right to own property as a fundamental right, employs a gender-egalitarian attitude in this area of jurisprudence.
In fact, there is a hadith specifically directed to transforming the early Muslim population out of this patriarchal attitude
of male financial compensation for female sexual activity. During the time of Prophet Muhammad, a young man committed zina
with his employer’s wife. The father of the young man gave one hundred goats and a maid as compensation to the employer,
who accepted it. When the case was reported to the Prophet, he ordered the return of the goats and the maid to the young man’s
father and prosecuted the adulterer for zina (Abu Daud 1990, 3: Bk. 33, No. 4430; Bukhâri 1985, 8:Bk. 81, Nos. 815,
821, 826).<O:P> </O:P> Early Islam thus established that there
should be no tolerance of the attitude that a woman’s sexual activity is something to be bartered, pawned, gossiped
about, or owned by the men in her life. Personal responsibility of every human being for their own actions is a fundamental
principle in Islamic thought.<O:P> </O:P> Marital Rape The Quran is very clear that the basis of a marital relationship
is love and affection between the spouses, not power or control. Rape is unacceptable in such a relationship. Sûrah al Baqarah 2.223 'Your wives are your tilth; go then unto your tilth as you
may desire, but first provide something for your souls*, and remain conscious of God, and know
that your are destined to meet Him...' * Note in Muhammad Asad's translation: 'a spiritual relationship between
man and woman is postulated as the indispensable basis of sexual relations.' Sûrah
ar Rum 30.21 "And among His wonders is this: He creates for you mates out of your own kind, so that your might incline
towards then, and He engenders love and tenderness between you: in this, behold, there are messages indeed for people who
think! Sûrah al Baqarah 2.187 "... They are as a garment for you,
and you are as a garment for them." Sûrah al Nisa 4.19 "...
And consort with your wives in a goodly manner, for if you dislike them, it may well be that you dislike something which God
might yet make a source of abundant good." "Is there recognition of marital
rape in Islam? In the context of jirah, it would appear so: where there is any physical harm or disease caused to a spouse,
there may be a claim for jirah compensation. The law of jirah provides for compensation for physical harm between spouses,
and supports Islamic legislation against domestic abuse. Even in these discussions of appropriate jirah
compensation, the question of the injured party’s consent plays a central role. Some Islamic jurists considered
consent to be presumed by virtue of the marital relationship, while others maintain that where harm occurs, it is an assault,
regardless of the consent, and therefore compensation is due. In our modern era, one might take these precedents and their
premium focus on consent and apply the Islamic principle of sexual autonomy to conclude that any sex without consent is harmful,
as a dishonoring of the unwilling party’s sexual autonomy. Thus, modern Islamic jurists and legislators, taking a gender-egalitarian
perspective, might conclude that Islamic law does recognize marital rape, and assign the appropriate injunctions and compensation
for this personally devastating harm." (Qureshi)<O:P> An often
misquoted and abused hadith that is used to tyrannize women is that women cannot and should not say no to their husband when
he approaches them Women are advised not to turn away from their husbands except if they have their period or any other
reasonable excuse. So much so that she is to break her voluntary fast if her husband approaches her.
And if they do angels will curse them. However, this hadith is not quoted with the complementary one that advises men
of the same consideration.<O:P> </O:P><O:P></O:P> In the same manner men are advised that meeting the needs of their wives takes precedence over voluntary worship.
Narrated Abdullah bin Amr bin Al-As: "Prophet Muhammad (saw) said, “O Abdullah! I have been informed that
you fast all the day and stand in prayer all night?” I said, ‘Yes, O Allah's Apostle!’ He said, “Do
not do that! Observe the fast sometimes and also leave them at other times, stand up for the prayer at night and also sleep
at night. Your body has a right over you and your wife has a right over you.” (Bukhâri) To a certain degree these ahâdîth are used to confuse and distract from the issue,
since rape does not have anything to do with permission or lack of permission. In a marriage abusive or forced sexual
activity cannot be justified by abusing this hadith. Rape is defined as unwanted, violent and forced sex, whether this
occurs in a marital context or outside it. The definition of rape does not change because of the relationship. It is important to not confuse the issue of mutual rights that a couple has on each other with
the misguided, distorted and misogynist assumption that women become a husband's property. Islam does not allow
for or tolerate ownership of human beings. Human dignity does not allow that
any one person has the right to own, mind/body/soul, another human being... and Islam demands that all human beings respect
the humanity of everyone.<O:P> </O:P> Incest
& Child Abuse The Quran clearly outlines those with whom marriage is not permitted, we can extrapolate from
it that any sexual relation with these would be unacceptable. Sûrah
an Nisa 4:23: Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your
fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the
girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated
the marriage - if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women
who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time - but do not break up
existing marriages. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. This includes your foster parents,
siblings and children. Al Hasan reports: ‘If somebody commits illegal intercourse
with his sister, his punishment is the same as for any other person who commits such a crime’. (Bukhâri Vol. 8
pp 526)<O:P> Thus, these same laws mentioned above in cases of rape
would be equally applicable, and incest can be prosecuted as a crime within the bounds of Islamic law. </O:P> According to Islam, all aspects of life, ie: the
physical, mental, emotional and spiritual, are sacred and must be respected. No gender or relationship
has been given the power or right to hurt or harm the other. Domestic violence, rape and incest are all violent and criminal
abuses that are outside the bounds of what is permitted in Islam and there is absolutely no justification for it whatsoever. <O:P> </O:P> References: -Ghazâlî; “Ihya Ulum ud Din” -Hasan, Riffat; “Religious Human Rights
in Global Perspective: Religious Perspectives” John Witte, Jr. and Johan D. van der Vyver Eds. Martinus
Nijhoff Publishers, 1996 -Maudoodi, Abu al Ala; “Human Rights in Islam” The Islamic Foundation
UK 1976, 1993 -Qureshi, Asifa LLM; “Her Honor: An Islamic Critique of the
Rape Laws of Pakistan from a Woman-Sensitive Perspective” -Rahman, Afzal ur; "Role of Muslim Women in Society"
Seerah Foundation, London, 1986 -Rauf, Muhammad Abdul; “Umar al Faruq”
Al Saadawi Publications, 1998 Abridged version of article published
in the September issue of 'Islâmic Reflections 2002' Contact
Info: UzmaMazhar@hotmail.com |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

Child Abuse - Taboo in Judaism
Hadass Golandsky
I do not want to hurt or blame anyone with my observations, rather much more, to direct
attention to this grave problem. The only ones who can make changes, who can intervene and help, are those who are aware.
Imagine that your rabbi or his wife beats their children. Would you do something to help
the children? Would you speak with the rabbi? Call in the youth office or even the police? Most of us would simply do nothing.
After all, it's about our rabbi. Many would think "He has good qualities too that" to find a reason not to get involved. We
also think that it is definitely a case of exception, that the rabbi or his wife feels stressed, that it's not easy to be
a rabbi in Europe, etc., etc. In this way, we have created a taboo. Because we cannot and do not want to imagine at all that
child abuse is wide spread in Judaism.
What is child abuse? The spectrum is nearly endless: it reaches from bodily to psychological
- and from violent to "soft" abuse. For the victim - children, in this case - every form of abuse profoundly undermines his/her
sense of security: it damages body, spirit and/or soul and often brings devastating consequences for further development.
Children who fall victim to abuse are people who are unable to provide for themselves. The are dependent on the help and support
of adults (at first, mainly their parents). The perpetrators are people (chiefly adults), who either consciously or unconsciously
exploit the helplessness of their children to their own advantage. I will deal with sexual abuse of children here as an example,
and with the help of biblical citation, will show that this problem does not only exists in Judaism, but also that it is a
great taboo.
Sexual abuse of children may not be equated with rape - even though when many people want
to believe that. With sexual abuse, the perpetrator uses the child to become sexually aroused and to attain sexual gratification
for hin/herselve. The most difficult situation is the one in which the perpetrator is a member of the child's family (incest).
A father who lets his daughter dance for him and
becomes sexually aroused or masturbates, without telling the child to stop, has already
abused her sexually. A mother who caresses her son's genitals while diapering him, and becomes sexually aroused, or, has an
orgasm, sexually abuses her child. Those are just two examples for more or less unconscious sexual abuse. But what does that
have to do with Judaism? Sexual abuse of children is taboo everywhere. And yet sexual abuse of children is widespread in our
modern society. It is generally assumed that every third girl and every fifth boy is sexually abused, mostly in their own
families. In Israel, the talk is of every fifth girl. Boys are hardly mentioned, and in orthodox cities in Israel, according
to statistics, sexual abuse of children hardly exists. Among the Jews in the Diaspora, the numbers are unclear. Is Israel
really "better" than the rest of the Western world? Are we Jews really spared this problem? Or is sexual abuse of children
so taboo in Judaism that we actually believe it doesn't exist?
How is it that sexual abuse of children is more taboo in Judaism than in other Western
religions and societies? First, we generally characterize the People of Israel, positively, and in so doing tend to cover
up our human weakness. As the "Chosen People", as "Light of the Peoples", we should be an example for all the other nations.
As such, something like sexual abuse of children cannot exist. The Jews are also named "The People of the Book". The Torah
is not only our doctrine, but also our book of law. In it, we find many prohibitions and laws that gove them impression that
sexual abuse of children doesn’t exit and severe punishments that made incest taboo.
Lot and his Daughters
Let us begin with the famous story of Lot and his daughters (Gen. 19.30):
"And Lot went up out of the Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with
him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar; and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. And the first-born said unto the younger:
'Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth. Come let us
make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.' And they made their father
drink wine that night. And the first-born went in, and lay with her father; and he knew not when she lay down, nor when she
arose. And it came to pass on the morrow, that the first-born said unto the younger: 'Behold, I lay yesternight with my father.
Let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.' And
they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose, and lay with him; he knew not when she lay down,
nor when she arose. Thus were both, the daughters of Lot, with child by their father. And the first-born bore a son, and called
his name Moab - the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day. And the younger, she also bore a son, and called his
name Ben-ammi- the same is the father of the children of Ammon unto this day."
At first glance, the story appears to be completely clear: the daughters were desperate
because they believed there were no men in that land, and they outwitted their father into having sex with them. That is also
the usual interpretation. Yet, is the story really so simple? Let's go into it more deeply: Lot, Abraham's nephew, lived with
his wife and two daughters in Gomorra, a city that, together with Sodom, formed the cities of sin that God completely annihilated
(Gen. 19, 24-25). It is not clear exactly what happened in Sodom and Gomorra, only that the citizens of both cities were extremely
evil. But evil in what way? The name of the city Sodom can give us a hint, because sodomy means sex with an animal. In modern
Hebrew, the word means anal rape. This brings us to the assumption that forbidden sexual practices were carried out in Sodom
and Gomorra. Although Lot was represented as the only just man in Gomorra (Gen. 19,1), and together with his wife and daughter,
was the only one to be saved, we must still ask why he had lived for so long in such a city at all. Was Lot perhaps nice only
once to the guests, the messengers of God who had come to the city, but otherwise evil like all the other inhabitants? Verse
29 in the same chapter gives us one indication that Lot was actually not so good: And it came to pass, when God destroyed
the cities of the Plain, that God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the destruction, when He destroyed
the cities in the area where Lot dwelt." That means that God saved Lot not because he was the only just man in Sodom and Gomorra,
but because he was related to Abraham!
As we know, Lot's wife froze into a pillar of salt while fleeing out of Gomorra (Gen. 19,
26) and Lot was left alone with his two grown daughters. He was afraid to settle in Zoar and moved with his daughters into
the mountains, where he lived alone with them in a cave (Verse 30). Why was he afraid to live in a city that God had recommended
to him? One has to simply wonder why he could live fearlessly in Sodom and Gomorra, but not in Zoar.
It is not known how long Lot and his daughters lived in the cave. One day, in any case,
the older daughter decided to sleep with her father because there were no men in the land (Verse 31). How did she arrive at
that conclusion? The daughters were certainly not born in the cave, away from civilization. They didn't only know men and
women in Sodom and Gomorra, but they certainly must have also seen and met men in Zoar and on the way into the mountains.
The daughters had their father drink wine until he noticed nothing more (Verse 33). That means, that Lot must have been so
drunk that he lost consciousness. In such a state, he couldn't have been physical capable of having an erection! At the end
of the story, each daughter then brings a son into the world (Verse 37). But that his daughters became pregnant doesn't seem
to have surprised Lot at all. If he really hadn't noticed anything, and if there actually had been no men in the land, he
must indeed have been quite astounded!
This closer look at the story brings us thus to the conclusion that Lot was for some reason
protected, perhaps because he was Abraham's nephew, or perhaps because in Biblical opposed to post-biblical times, as the
family line stemmed from the father, and his children and grandchildren founded two important tribes. (Verse 37).
Prohibition on Incest
Incest was not only hushed up in stories, but also tabooed by laws, bans, commandments
and repetitions. Most of the laws of the Torah are found in the Third. Book of Moses, including the prohibition on incest
(Lev. 18 and 20.) Many of the laws in chapter 20 are repeated from from chapter 18, for example, the prohibition on homosexuality
(Verse 22.) In Israel and in progressive Judaism, (Reform and Liberal Judaism), homosexuality is currently no longer taboo.
Unfortunately, mention of incest still is.
We find the prohibition on incest in greater detail in Lev. 18,6-17. In the following list,
the specific prohibitions on incest are given. The perpetrator is always the one to whom the prohibition applies:
- General prohibition on incest, Verse 2;
- Sex with parents, verse 7, perpetrator: child;
- Sex with the mother, respectively, step-mother, Verse 8, perpetrator, child;
- Sex with the sister, respectively, half-sister, Verse 9, perpetrator: child:
- Sex with the aunt, Verse 12-13, perpetrator: child;
- Sex with the uncle, Verse 14, perpetrator: child.
- Sex with the uncle's wife, Verse 14, perpetrator: child;
- Sex with the sister-in-law, Verse 15; perpetrator: child;
- Sex with the daughter-in-law, Verse 15, perpetrator: child;
- Sex with the granddaughter, Verse 19, perpetrator: grandfather;
- Sex with the step-daughter, Verse 17, perpetrator: step-father;
- Sex with step-granddaughter, Verse 17, perpetrator: step-grandfather.
In most of the cases (7 from 11), the perpetrator is the child, who doesn't have to be
a minor. The first detailed prohibition refers to sex with the parents. There is, however, no prohibition that refers to sex
with the daughter or son. The biological father and biological mother, are not denoted as perpetrators. There is no woman
as perpetrator.
Atrocities
Unfortunately, I do not have an explanation for these phenomena. Yet, if the incest prohibitions
to do not apply to the parents, it means that they must never have been perpetrators. Parents who sexually abuse their children
are therefore taboo! And if a sexual act occurs with the father or the mother, the child is guilty and not the parents.
After the prohibitions follow the warning, the repulsion and the choosing of the people
of Israel: "Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things; for in all these the nations are defiled, which I cast out from
before you. And the land was defiled, therefore I did visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land vomited out her inhabitants..."
(Lev. 18, 24-25). The punishment was announced at the end: "For whosoever shall do any of these abominations, even the souls
that do them shall be cut off from among their people" (Verse 29). In chapter 20, the punishment for these atrocities is death.
Next to murder and idolatry, incest is one of the three main atrocities in the Torah.
It is often maintained that because of the forceful and repetitive warnings and threats
of death penalty, incest does not exist in Judaism. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
An additional taboo – related to incest may be inferred one of the 10 commandments,
which - like the prohibition on incest - is listed twice in the Torah (Ex. 20,1-17 and Dtn. 5,6-20). The 6th commandment:
"Honor thy father and mother, as the Lord thy God commanded thee..." obligates the child to honor his parents, regardless
of what they have done or do to him. This commandment is further enforced by the obligation to God, in which the child who
is abused by his parents can in no way act against them. A commandment "Honor thy children" doesn't exist.
Abuse by Circumcision
What role does the Torah play in our lives? Which commandments and laws do we keep and
which not? The commandment to keep Shabbat or kashrut is not observed by many. The commandment to circumcise is kept by nearly
all Jews, and in my eyes, that is the greatest taboo related to sexual abuse of children in Judaism. Questioning the commandment
to circumcise is so deeply tabooed in Judaism, that it's neither talked about nor criticized.
Circumcision appears first in Genesis 17, 10-13, where God enters the first covenant with
Abraham: "This is My covenant, which ye shall keep, between Me and you and thy seed after thee: every male among you shall
be circumcised. And ye shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of a covenant betwixt Me
and you. And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every male throughout your generations..."
There is hardly a Jew worldwide who is not circumcised and hardly a circumcision carried
out without religious ritual. There are hardly any Jews who would dare to question (publicly) circumcision or to call it child
abuse. I am not in any way talking about the act of circumcision. Many people think that removing the foreskin is healthier
and more hygienic. That may be. But circumcision because of disease can be carried out at a later point in time, when the
child is already able to understand the necessity of such an operation. In few cases is a circumcision necessary for reasons
of health directly after birth. I refer here to the religious act, that is performed on all Jewish boys at the age of eight
days. It can be debated whether an infant of this age experiences sexual sensation, but the assumption that at eight days
a baby is not as sensitive to pain as is an older child, is simply wrong. A baby cannot speak out "that hurts!".
Circumcision is a violent intervention and a wounding of a child's genitals, which purely
physically is a form of sexual abuse, of sexual maltreatment. Yes, it is very difficult thing for many of us to accept, because
it could mean that all Jews who have their sons circumcised are sexual perpetrators. As mentioned above, it is neither my
intention to blame anyone nor to present all Jews as people who mistreat children. I merely want to break every form of taboo
about child abuse and to stimulate discussions so that we can better deal with the subject. We can do it through attentiveness,
by questioning and by learning.
Biblical citations from: The Pentateuch and Haftorahs, Edited by Dr. J.H. Hertz, C.H.,
London.
Hadass Golandsky, born 1962 in Haifa, studied photography and pedagogic. 1987 she moved
to Vienna, where she works as a secretary at the Institute of Jewish Studies at the university of Vienna. Besides she is a
painter and a singer (under the name Haddi Golan). She teaches "Basic Judaism" at Or-Chadasch in Vienna and leads services.
Translated from German by Madelon Fleminger
[

Christian perspective 700 Club
Keys to Powerful Living: Overcoming Child Abuse
By CBN.com
CBN.com - Breaking Through The Veil Of Shame
Silent, uncontrollable sobbing ... Bruises and beatings ... Shoving and slapping ... Children so traumatized
they're afraid of their own shadows. And the endless string of lies ... "He fell down." "It was an accident." But child abuse
is no accident. It violates God's fundamental purpose for man. And parents and children around the world find themselves ensnared
in its cruel clutches.
From Taboo to Truth
When people hear the term "child abuse" they may think it only occurs in under-educated, poverty-stricken
families. However, this epidemic occurs in all types of families.
In America alone, reported cases of child abuse exceed 1 million each year, and some experts say the actual
number of abuse victims may be far greater.
Types of child abuse include physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse and neglect. Affected children
often suffer physical injuries, emotional scars, malnutrition, and sadly, even death. Child abuse also spiritually cripples
precious young lives. These children may struggle to accept God as their loving heavenly Father ( Matt. 18:5-6). Other family
members often suffer silently. Even the offender suffers, increasingly bound by the shame and secrecy of the addictive behavior.
But as many have already discovered, there is hope. The vicious cycle of abuse can be broken, especially as
we present our wounds to the Gentle Healer, Jesus Christ.
What Drives the Sin of Abuse?
So what causes child abuse? Often, parents who abuse their children have been victims of abuse themselves.
Driven by years of repressed hatred, these parents continue the cycle.
Sometimes even the most dedicated parents can momentarily lose control -- frustrated by a child's actions
or simply overwhelmed by their own sense of failure or frustration. But an isolated incident or two, left unchecked, can become
a destructive force, tearing apart a family.
God's View of Abuse
The Bible gives much practical advise on the subject of child-rearing. "Train up a child in the way he should
go, even when he is old he will not depart from it," says the writer of Proverbs ( 22:6). Parents are clearly cautioned to
take steps to correct foolishness which "is bound up in the heart of a child" ( Prov. 22:15).
Parental discipline is essential, but some parents view these Scriptures as giving absolute control over their
children. This is not true. God's Word should never be used as a license for abuse. Parents need to discipline their children,
but they must keep their own emotions and actions in check ( Eph. 6:4, Col. 3:21). In God's eyes there simply is no justification
for abuse.
Finding Help
If you are trapped in the unrelenting cycle and sin of child abuse, don't leave this webpage until you have
made a commitment before the Lord to break this destructive pattern. It won't be easy, but it could be a matter of life and
death. Understand that you are not alone. Jesus knows you better that you could ever know yourself (see Psalm 139), and He
is willing and able to help ( Heb. 4:15-16). But you need to ask for His grace to share honestly your struggle with a trusted
brother or sister in Christ, or with your pastor. Follow these steps to get help.
1. Acknowledge the problem. To receive healing, admit that you have a problem. Once you've broken the silence
and confessed your sin of abuse, God's grace and forgiveness can begin to restore you ( Psalm 32:3-7). 2. Acknowledge your
weakness. Allow God to minister in your weakness, for in it He can make you strong ( 2 Cor. 12:9, Heb. 1:32-34). 3. Take action.
Pray with other believers and share your struggles, seeking the help of pastors, or other appropriate counselors ( Prov. 15:22,
James 5:16).
If You've Been Abused
If you have been the victim of abuse, you need to know that God has not abandoned you. He is "intimately acquainted"
with all your ways ( Psalm 139:3). He knows your pain, and He has a plan for complete healing and restoration for your life.
Consider these simple steps as you seek the Father's healing.
1. Face the abuse. The shame associated with abuse is unbearable. You can hide the pain for a season, but
eventually, the wounds will surface. But take comfort, for God knows the horror that you have unjustly endured (see Psalm
139, Matt. 10:29-31). Ask God for the strength to face your nightmare of abuse.
2. Forgive and release. As difficult as it may sound, you need to begin by forgiving the perpetrator for his
or her actions against you. It may seem impossible, but the consequences of unforgiveness can produce even further destruction
( 2 Samuel 13:23-29). Instead, ask God to give you the grace you need to forgive ( 1 Samuel 1:15-17, Psalm 42:3-4, Psalm 62:8).
3. Seek shelter. If you are still in an abusive situation, immediately seek shelter. Consider turning to family
members, your church family, or perhaps authorities if necessary. Ultimately, rest in God's shelter. Turn to His Word (the
Psalms offer much encouragement for the downcast).
4. Move on. Once you have taken steps to forgive, ask God to help you pick up the pieces, and seek again the
abundant life in Jesus that He has for you ( John 10:10). Press on and leave the past to God ( Phil. 3:13-14).
As You Pray
If your life has been devastated by child abuse, turn to Jesus right now, and, on bended knee, ask Him to
take control of your life: "Dear Lord. I have never been confronted with a deeper, more urgent need than right now. Please
minister to me and my family members in Your perfect love and compassion. Break the chains which bind us. And restore us to
the joy of Your salvation as we receive forgiveness and healing in Christ Jesus. Amen."
God's Word on Child Abuse
"Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor your father and mother (which is the first
commandment with a promise), that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth. And, fathers, do not provoke
your children to anger; but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord." ( Eph. 6:1-4)
Scriptures for Study
Matthew 18:5-6, Mark 13-16 -- Jesus' attitude toward children
Ephesians 6:4, Colossians 3:21 -- Proper attitudes for parents
Psalm 32:3-7 -- Acknowledging the problem
James 5:13-20 -- The church and restoration
Hebrews 12:15 -- How to avoid bitterness
We're Here for You
Through our daily inspirational television program, The 700 Club, and other outreaches, CBN ministers
to millions every day. To learn more about the Christian life send us an e-mail. Or you can call our CBN Prayer Counseling Center at (800) 759-0700. We would love to talk with you and send
you some literature to help you in your walk with the Lord.
Unless otherwise noted, Scripture references are from the New American Standard Bible.
More CBN Teaching Sheets
More from Spiritual Life
Jehovah's Witnesses' Child Abuse Policies The Watchtower Society, a not-for-profit organization headquartered in New York City is the main legal entity used by Jehovah's
Witnesses religious faith; It is often referred by them as The Society or The Organization. This organization usually holds
copyrights to literature published by Jehovah's Witnesses, which is considered by it members as current doctrine, policy
and 'the direct channel of communication with Jehovah God.'[3] In recent years, Jehovah's Witnesses have published information on
how to protect children from sexual molestation. This includes articles such as "Protect Your Children" in the October 8, 1993 edition of Awake! magazine, the article Help Your Children to Thrive in Awake! of August 8, 1997 and the series "Keep Your Children Safe" in the November
2007 edition of Awake! magazine and chapter 32 of a book for children entitled Learn from theGreat Teacher.
These articles focus on prevention by helping children understand what sexual abuse is, to say no to molesters and to tell
their parents about attempted abuse. Jehovah's Witnesses' policy does not apply solely to those holding appointed
positions, but to everyone associated with the organization.[4] Two Eyewitnesses Policy
Jehovah's Witnesses' congregational judicial policies require having the testimony of two eyewitnesses to
establish a perpetrator's guilt in the absence of confession.[5] This requirement is based on a number of Biblical passages (Deut. 17:6; Deut. 19:15; Matt. 18:15; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim.
5:19) that refer to matters being established at the mouth of two or three eyewitnesses. The Watchower public information
department specifies that this two-eyewitness policy concerns only how the congregation handles the sin and not whether the matter is reported to the authorities. The requirement of two eyewitnesses to
establish an accusation is claimed to be a protection against malicious accusations of abuse.[citation needed] To establish proof by two eyewitnesses, it is not necessary that both have been present at the same instance
of child molestation. Starting in 2002, statements by two victims could be accepted.[6] Jehovah's Witness spokesmen state that if two persons are eyewitnesses to separate incidents of the same kind of
wrongdoing, their testimony may be deemed sufficient to take action[7] and internal sanctions imposed. In cases where there is only one eyewitness,
the victim, to an allegation of child abuse, elders are instructed to 'monitor' the accused very closely. If there
is some valid reason to suspect that the alleged perpetrator is still abusing children, a 'warning' may have to be
given (to the congregation for its protection).[8] Testimony based on one person's repressed memories is not considered reliable enough to form the basis for an internal action. Repressed memories are
not viewed as true or false, simply as insufficient proof. Elders are encouraged to treat persons reporting this type of memory
with kindness[9] and dismiss the case unless further proof is found. It is important to
note that the two eyewitnesses policy is applied solely to congregational discipline and has no bearing on whether the crime
is reported to the police, which is most often the case. A serious problem with this policy is the fact that elders have no
professional training in child sex abuse investigation or forensic science. Evidence given by forensic experts/police is acceptable as a second "eyewitness". Three year rule
Crucial to legal actions
taken against the Watchtower Society has been the “Three Year” rule. This allowed for known sex offenders to continue
serving as elders, provided any known offences were committed at least three years prior to confession. The 1972 book Organization
for Kingdom-Preaching and Disciple-Making stated: “If a person was
serving as an elder or a ministerial servant when he committed a serious wrong, even though it was some years ago, he bears
a degree of reprehensibility, for he continued to serve in that position though knowing that he had, for the time at least,
disqualified himself, not being then “free from accusation.” (1 Tim. 3:2, 10; Titus 1:6,7) He should have informed
the judicial committee that he did not adhere to the requirements and should have stepped down from his position. In view
of his failure to do this at that time, he would now be removed from that position.” The term “some years ago” was clarified shortly afterwards in Our Kingdom Ministry October 1972,
p.8, as a time period of three years: “What was meant by “some years
ago” on page 170, paragraph two, in the “Organization” book? This indicates more than a year or two. It
may be noted that it did not say “many years ago.” So it is not the exact number of years, but more like two or
three years. It was not intended to have a brother go back into the distant past to bring up wrongs of which he repented years
ago and that have evidently been forgiven by Jehovah and are not practiced now.” This position was re-confirmed at the 1991 two-day Kingdom Ministry Schools.[citation needed] It was not until the 2005 Kingdom Ministry Schools that it was clearly stated that hidden acts of “porneia”
(sexual sins) were to require an internal judicial committee.[citation needed] Questioning the Victim
Elders have specific direction to follow if a child reports abuse such as not ask probing or intimate questions.
This is very important as it has legal implications. Elders are instructed that however surprising the allegations, the elder
should not indicate disbelief in any way. Nor should he express any criticism of the complainant.[10] In fact, elders are 'spiritual shepherds' and are not qualified to investigate or evaluate an allegation of
child abuse. The Watchtower Society claims that abused victims are not required to face their abuser to make an accusation
and it was only in 1998 that elders were advised that if children are victims of molestation, the victims should not be required
to confront the accused.[11][12] Whether to seek help from a counselor or other mental-health professional
is considered to be a personal decision for the victim (or parents) to make but victims are advised to ensure that any counselor
consulted will respect the Jehovah's Witness doctrine.[13] Likewise, elders are instructed that there are times when an emotionally distressed member may seek professional help.
Whether or not a victim pursues treatment from psychiatrists, psychologists or therapists is a personal decision as long as the therapy does not conflict with their religious doctrine.[14] Congregation Discipline
Jehovah's Witnesses have a disciplinary system that applies to all congregation members who commit child
abuse, not merely to employees.[15] In the UK, elders are now instructed to investigate promptly all allegations of child molestation, although they have
no professional training to do so. Policy states that child sex victims urgently need to be protected from further abuse,
and abusers need to be prevented from finding additional victims.[16] This would involve having two elders investigate allegations of child abuse and, if these are deemed to have a sound
basis, forming an internal judicial committee. At this point, the accused is relieved of all positions of responsibility in
the congregation. Anyone found to have sexually molested a child and failing
to demonstrate repentance is to be disfellowshipped (excommunicated) from the congregation.[17] Numerous Jehovah's Witnesses who have committed child molestation have been subjected to disfellowshipping, a strong
sanction that is virtually unknown in most other faith-based groups. – See Cases of abuse below. Those judged repentant by a committee of elders are given 'public reproof'. Their names are announced to
the congregation, although their crime is not announced.[18] Some time later, a talk is given to the congregation, discussing the type of sin and the need to be on guard against
it, although this time nothing is said to connect the person to the type of sin committed.[19]; This sidesteps the acknowledgment that child sex abuse sins are crimes. For a considerable period of time those reproved in this way are not permitted to
participate in meetings by commenting in group discussions or making presentations from the platform.[20] They are immediately debarred from serving in any appointed position in the congregation, usually for life (see below
for exceptions). Restrictions to Child Molesters
Former child molesters, including those who molested children before becoming Jehovah's Witnesses, those eventually
reinstated into the congregation after being disfellowshipped and those who were deemed repentant are subject to a number
of symbolic restrictions, which normally remain in place permanently. The policy is rehashed in this 1997 Watchtower
article: "For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible
position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service."[21] According to an internal document sent out in 2002, former sex offenders are not assigned to read paragraphs during
congregation studies, and are not assigned even minor responsibilities in the congregation, such as practical duties in the
Kingdom Hall (looking after microphones, supplying members with books or magazines) and not offering public prayer.
The person's home may not usually be used for congregation meetings.[22] Those known to have engaged in child molestation in the past are not permitted to participate in the congregation's
house-to-house preaching, unless accompanied by a responsible adult. According to the Watchtower Society spokesman J. R. Brown,
sex offenders are restricted from working with minors and must also be with a well-respected church member when they go door
to door.[23] Commenting on the effect of these symbolic restrictions, Jehovah's Witness legal representative, Mario Moreno is
quoted as saying that because of the church's structure, the fact that a sex offender, who would have fewer rights in
the congregation, would alert members that 'he obviously lacks spiritual maturity.'[24] A fax sent by the Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information to the producers of the BBC's Panorama TV program stated that at least twenty years must have passed before an individual who committed an act
of child sex abuse could even be considered for appointment to a responsible position in the congregation, if ever.[25] If a former child abuser moves to another congregation, elders from the
previous congregation must send a letter to the new congregation's elders, outlining his background and providing needed
cautions,[26] but only if that abuser currently is still under the symbolic 'restricted privileges'. Also, under no circumstances
are previous commun
| | |